Case 2415175/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Smith v Esssity UK Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2415175/2021
- Decision date
- 9 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim. It had given the claimant an opportunity by letter dated 29 June 2022 to make representations, or request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because the claimant had not complied with the tribunal's orders dated 16 May 2022 and 29 June 2022 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The preliminary hearing listed for 16 September 2022 and the final hearing listed for 16 November 2022 and 30 October to 1 November 2023 did not take place.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The reasons do not identify the substantive claim type; this entry reflects the Layer 1 listing of unfair dismissal. The tribunal struck out the claim because the claimant did not comply with the orders dated 16 May 2022 and 29 June 2022 and had not actively pursued it. | Struck out | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The reasons do not identify the substantive claim type; this entry reflects the Layer 1 listing of disability discrimination. The tribunal struck out the claim because the claimant did not comply with the orders dated 16 May 2022 and 29 June 2022 and had not actively pursued it. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.