Case 2415197/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Kun v Gill Foods Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2415197/2019
- Decision date
- 31 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Whittaker
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Kun
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by Employment Judge Whittaker sitting alone by CVP on 11 March 2021. The respondent did not attend and had not filed a Response, despite being given a further opportunity to do so by 19 February 2021. An interpreter assisted the Tribunal and the claimant, and the claimant affirmed the truth of his evidence.
On the wages issue, the claimant confirmed the amounts and calculations he had set out in his email of 9 December 2020. The reasons record four sums of £15.50, £10.67, £134.84 and £821.16. The Tribunal accepted those calculations and found that the total should be paid by the respondent. The reasons state that the four sums total £982.17, although the formal numbered order at paragraph 1 records £912.17.
The claimant also confirmed on oath the discrimination allegations summarised in the case management summaries. The Tribunal found those allegations proven and held that the claims of race discrimination and religious discrimination succeeded. No separate monetary award for those discrimination claims is recorded in the reasons.
Any claims under the Transfer of Undertakings Regulations 2006 were not pursued. After discussion at the hearing, the claimant confirmed that he did not wish to continue with them, and they were treated as withdrawn.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The formal numbered order at paragraph 1 states £912.17, but the reasons at paragraph 3 record four component sums of £15.50, £10.67, £134.84 and £821.16, which total £982.17. | Upheld | — | £982 |
| Race discrimination | The judgment found the allegations in the case management summaries proven on the claimant's oath evidence; no separate compensation is recorded in the reasons. | Upheld | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The judgment found the allegations in the case management summaries proven on the claimant's oath evidence; no separate compensation is recorded in the reasons. | Upheld | Religion or belief | — |
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | The claimant confirmed at the hearing that he did not wish to pursue any claims under the Transfer of Undertakings Regulations 2006, and any such claims were withdrawn. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £982
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.