Case 2415206/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Bannister v Bulloughs Cleaning Services Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2415206/2020
- Decision date
- 16 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mark Butler
- Venue
- Manchester
- Panel members
- Ms J Byrne, Mr P Dobson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Bannister
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal at Manchester, before Employment Judge Mark Butler with Ms J Byrne and Mr P Dobson, held that Bulloughs Cleaning Services had made unlawful deductions from Mrs A Bannister's wages. It awarded her the agreed gross sum of £448.51 in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also dealt with the claimant's complaint that she had been subjected to detriments on the grounds of having made a qualifying disclosure or qualifying disclosures. That claim was found not well-founded and was dismissed.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's note.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made unlawful deductions from the claimant's wages and awarded the agreed gross sum of £448.51. | Upheld | — | £449 |
| Whistleblowing | The claim that the claimant had been subjected to detriments because she had made a qualifying disclosure or qualifying disclosures was found not well-founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £449
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.