Case 2415223/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Currie v The Auction Centre Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2415223/2019
- Decision date
- 28 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Currie
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Liverpool on 19 August 2020, Employment Judge Shotter recorded a consent judgment under which the respondent, The Auction Centre Limited, was to pay the claimant, Mr A Currie, within 28 days. The sums recorded were £3,000 as damages for unfair dismissal and £625 net as damages for wrongful dismissal (notice pay).
The judgment does not set out findings of fact or reasons on liability. It records a consensual disposal rather than a merits determination, and the notice attached to the judgment explains that interest may accrue if the sums are not paid within 14 days after the decision was sent on 28 August 2020, with the calculation day stated as 29 August 2020 and the stipulated rate of interest as 8%.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Resolved by consent; the tribunal recorded that the respondent would pay damages of £3,000 within 28 days. | Settled | — | £3,000 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Resolved by consent; the tribunal recorded that the respondent would pay £625 net within 28 days as notice pay. | Settled | — | £625 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,625
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.