Case 2415226/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Ehimwenma v LM Protection Solutions Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2415226/2019
- Decision date
- 17 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sherratt
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Ehimwenma
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Sherratt found that LM Protection Solutions Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr K Ehimwenma's wages. The judgment states that the respondent was ordered to pay a gross sum of £1,500 and, separately, a gross sum of £280 in respect of commission.
The judgment does not set out detailed reasons beyond the default finding and award. It does not record any discrimination, dismissal, redundancy, or contractual damages findings, and it does not apportion the sums across multiple claims. The total monetary award recorded on the face of the judgment is £1,780 gross.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages. The tribunal ordered payment of gross sums of £1,500 and £280 in respect of commission. | Upheld | — | £1,780 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,780
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.