Case 2415228/2020 · Employment Tribunal
in person For the v Steve Mannion (director) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2415228/2020
- Decision date
- 10 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
in person For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting before Employment Judge Johnson on 4 February 2021, dismissed the claimant's unfair dismissal complaint and redundancy payment complaint as not well founded. The judgment records that the unfair dismissal claim was unsuccessful and that the redundancy payment claim was also unsuccessful.
The complaint of unlawful deductions from wages and unpaid annual leave succeeded only in a limited respect. The tribunal found that the claimant was not informed of his termination date on 31 July 2020 until 4 August 2020, and treated 4 August 2020 as the first date on which he could reasonably have been expected to be told of the dismissal.
On that basis, the respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £250 in settlement of the unlawful deductions and unpaid annual leave complaints. The tribunal also noted that no order for recoupment was necessary because the unfair dismissal complaint failed and no compensatory award was made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The complaint was found not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The complaint was found not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint of unlawful deductions from wages and unpaid annual leave succeeded only insofar as it related to the claimant not being informed of his termination date on 31 July 2020 until 4 August 2020, which the tribunal treated as the first date on which he could reasonably be expected to have been informed of his dismissal. | Upheld | — | £250 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £250
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.