Case 2415231/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M McAdam v Merseyside Network for Change Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2415231/2019
- Decision date
- 24 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter DEFAULT
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M McAdam
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Shotter found that Mrs M McAdam, who was 67 years of age at the effective date of termination, was made redundant on 23 August 2019 and was entitled to a redundancy payment. The award for redundancy was £4,947.54 gross, calculated using a gross weekly wage of £253.72, 13 years' service, and a multiplicand of 1.5.
The tribunal also found the claimant's wrongful dismissal claim well founded and ordered the respondent to pay 12 weeks' unpaid statutory notice in the sum of £2,900.64 net, based on £241.72 per week. It further found the claim for unpaid accrued holidays well founded and ordered payment of £1,611.40 net for 20 days at £80.57 net per day. The total of the awards made was £9,459.58.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was made redundant on 23 August 2019 and entitled to a redundancy payment calculated from a gross weekly wage of £253.72, 13 years' service, and a 1.5 multiplicand. | Upheld | — | £4,948 |
| Wrongful dismissal | The tribunal found the wrongful dismissal claim well founded and ordered 12 weeks' unpaid statutory notice at £241.72 per week. | Upheld | — | £2,901 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment refers to unpaid accrued holidays; this has been classified as holiday_pay. | Upheld | — | £1,611 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,460
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.