Case 2415234/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Steele v Tangerine Holdings — 2021
- Case reference
- 2415234/2020
- Decision date
- 12 May 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Steele
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr S Steele brought a claim against Tangerine Holdings Ltd for unfair dismissal contrary to section 100 and/or section 104 Employment Rights Act 1996. The tribunal found that the claim was not well-founded and dismissed it.
The case was heard remotely by CVP at Manchester Employment Tribunal on 9 February 2021 and 4 May 2021 before Employment Judge Dunlop. The judgment records that the hearing was by consent because a face-to-face hearing was not practicable during the covid-19 pandemic. Written reasons were not provided because reasons had been given orally and no request for written reasons was recorded within the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Claim presented as unfair dismissal contrary to section 100 and/or section 104 Employment Rights Act 1996. The judgment states it was not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 100 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 104 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.