Case 2415248/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Jones v Mike Pryce — 2020
- Case reference
- 2415248/2019
- Decision date
- 2 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Jones
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, proceeding under Rule 21, found that Mike Pryce had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr S Jones's wages. The judgment records a single successful claim for unlawful deduction from wages and orders payment to the claimant of the net sum of £2,760.
The tribunal directed that the respondent account to HMRC for any income tax or national insurance contributions due on the grossed-up sum so that the claimant receives the ordered net amount. Payment was ordered within 14 days, and the hearing listed for 2 March 2020 was cancelled. The accompanying notice explains the tribunal's standard interest regime if the award is not paid within 14 days of the relevant decision day, but no separate interest figure is set out in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. | Upheld | — | £2,760 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,760
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.