Case 2415271/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Sanders v English Lakes Hotels Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2415271/2020
- Decision date
- 18 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rice-Birchall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Sanders
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Manchester by CVP on 8 March 2021 before Employment Judge Rice-Birchall sitting alone. The claimant, Mr M Sanders, appeared in person and the respondent, English Lakes Hotels Limited, was represented by a solicitor. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
The judgment records that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim failed and was dismissed. It also records that the claimant's allegation that the respondent made unlawful deductions from wages and/or breached the contract of employment failed and was dismissed. No separate monetary award is recorded in the decision.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal dismissed the claimant's unlawful deductions claim together with the breach of contract allegation. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal dismissed the breach of contract allegation together with the unlawful deductions claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.