Case 2415279/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C McGowan v Rainbow Blinds Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2415279/2021
- Decision date
- 11 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McDonald
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C McGowan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 6 July 2022, the tribunal gave Mr McGowan an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated basis was that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success and had not been actively pursued.
Mr McGowan did not make representations in writing, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, Employment Judge McDonald struck out the claim on 11 October 2022. The extracted text does not identify the underlying substantive claim(s) beyond the case listing, and it records no remedy because the claim was struck out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not specify the substantive claim type(s). The tribunal struck out the claim after a 6 July 2022 letter inviting representations or a hearing because the claim had no reasonable prospect of success and had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- no reasonable prospect of success
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.