Case 2415314/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Battison v British Polythene Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2415314/2018
- Decision date
- 8 January 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Horne REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Battison
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records only the respondent's employer's contract claim. At the hearing before Employment Judge Horne on 14 December 2018, the claim was withdrawn by the respondent and the judgment states that it was dismissed following that withdrawal.
The tribunal's note explains that the dismissal was not a determination of the claim on its merits. It says the claim was withdrawn because it appeared the tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider it.
No substantive findings were made on liability, no remedy was awarded, and no further claims are recorded in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the respondent's employer's contract claim was dismissed following withdrawal by the respondent. The note states this was not a determination on the merits and that the claim was withdrawn because it appeared the tribunal had no jurisdiction to consider it. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.