Case 2415317/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Bradley v Thg No1 Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2415317/2020
- Decision date
- 5 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Bradley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in Miss A Bradley v THG No1 Limited. The tribunal found that the unfair dismissal claim was well founded and stated in terms that the claimant was unfairly dismissed.
The tribunal awarded a basic award of £4,498.34 and a compensatory award of £13,490.44. The compensatory award was made up of £500 for loss of statutory rights, £10,190.96 for lost earnings for 27 June 2020 to 29 June 2021, less other earnings of £2,296.00, leaving £7,894.96 for past loss, plus £5,095.48 for 26 weeks' future loss.
The judgment states that the recoupment regulations apply. It records a total monetary award of £17,988.78, a prescribed element of £7,894.96, and an amount by which the monetary award exceeds the prescribed element of £10,093.82.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim well founded and awarded a basic award and compensatory award. The judgment also records that the recoupment regulations apply. | Upheld | — | £17,989 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £17,989
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £4,498
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £13,490
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.