Case 2415326/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v McKenna v JD Sports Fashion plc — 2022
- Case reference
- 2415326/2021
- Decision date
- 27 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter JUDGMENT
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 23 June 2022, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not make representations that the tribunal regarded as sufficient, and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The extracted judgment contains no merits findings and no monetary remedy, and the judgment was sent to the parties on 27 September 2022.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Underlying head identified from the case listing; the judgment itself only records that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Underlying head identified from the case listing; the judgment itself only records that the claim was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.