Case 2415344/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Mulrooney v Icare Solutions Merseyside Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2415344/2020
- Decision date
- 28 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson
- Venue
- Liverpool
- Panel members
- Ms A Ross – Sercombe, Mr J Murdie
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Mulrooney
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place at Liverpool on 23 and 24 June 2022 before Employment Judge Benson sitting with Ms A Ross-Sercombe and Mr J Murdie. The respondent did not attend. The written record states that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that written reasons will not be provided unless requested, so the document records the outcomes rather than a full narrative of findings.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's monetary claims. It found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £2,111.26 gross, which included £192.70 statutory sick pay. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered £299.25 net damages, and it found that holiday entitlement had not been paid and ordered £503.50 gross.
The tribunal dismissed the complaint of unfair dismissal pursuant to s.103A Employment Rights Act 1996, the complaint of detriment pursuant to s.47B Employment Rights Act 1996, the direct sex discrimination claim, and the indirect age discrimination claim. It also ordered a Preparation Time Order of £615 under Rule 76 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The attached notice records a relevant decision day of 28 June 2022, a calculation day of 29 June 2022, and a stipulated interest rate of 8%, but no separate interest amount is stated in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
7 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The gross award includes £192.70 statutory sick pay. | Upheld | — | £2,111 |
| Breach of contract | Damages were awarded net in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £299 |
| Holiday pay | Gross award for unpaid holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £504 |
| Unfair dismissal | Complaint of unfair dismissal pursuant to s.103A Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Complaint of detriment pursuant to s.47B Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | Direct sex discrimination claim dismissed. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Age discrimination | Indirect age discrimination claim dismissed. | Dismissed | Age | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,529
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.103A ERA 1996
- s.47B ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.