Case 2415345/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Galpin v Arlington Management Services Ltd (In Administration) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2415345/2020
- Decision date
- 11 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Galpin
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held a preliminary strike-out hearing on the papers and struck out Ms J Galpin's claim against Arlington Management Services Ltd (In Administration). The reason given was that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The tribunal recorded that, by a letter dated 28 January 2022, the claimant had been given an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out. It found that she failed to make written representations, or failed to make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
On that basis, Employment Judge Dunlop ordered that the claim be struck out. No substantive findings on the pleaded claims were recorded and no monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. By letter dated 28 January 2022, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing, but she did not make written representations or any sufficient representations and did not request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.