Case 2415395/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Khan v Peninsula Business Services Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2415395/2020
- Decision date
- 29 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr W Khan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed by the respondent. It awarded a basic award of £2,960.00, calculated by reference to four years of service, with the latter two years counted at the higher multiplier because the claimant was aged 41 or over, and using the statutory weekly cap of £538.00.
The tribunal also found there was a 100% chance that the claimant would have been dismissed even if a fair procedure had been followed. On that basis, it made no compensatory award. It further decided that no reduction should be made to the basic award for contributory conduct.
The claimant's wrongful dismissal claim for notice pay was dismissed, and his unpaid holiday pay claim was also dismissed. A £5.00 unauthorised deductions claim concerning recovery following the loss of a company laptop was dismissed upon withdrawal after the claimant accepted that the amount had already been refunded. Permission was refused for a further amendment to add a separate wages claim relating to a 'Developer on Call' supplement and/or overtime in February/March 2020.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the dismissal unfair but held there was a 100% chance the claimant would have been dismissed if a fair procedure had been followed, so no compensatory award was made. | Upheld | — | £2,960 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Described in the judgment as the claimant's claim for notice pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | This related to £5.00 recovered after the loss of a company laptop. The judgment records that the claimant accepted he had already been refunded, and the claim was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,960
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,960
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £0
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.