Case 2415413/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Sidra Farooq v Tesco Stores Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 2415413/2021
- Decision date
- 4 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Liz Ord
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Sidra Farooq
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimant had not obtained an ACAS early conciliation certificate before presenting her claims. It also found that the claims did not fall within any exemption from that requirement.
On that basis, the tribunal concluded that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claims. All claims in the case were dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, with written reasons to be provided only if requested within the specified time limit.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The public listing identifies a disability discrimination claim; the judgment states that all claims were dismissed because the claimant had not obtained an ACAS early conciliation certificate and no exemption applied. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Race discrimination | The public listing identifies a race discrimination claim; the judgment states that all claims were dismissed because the claimant had not obtained an ACAS early conciliation certificate and no exemption applied. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Religion or belief discrimination | The public listing identifies a religion or belief discrimination claim; the judgment states that all claims were dismissed because the claimant had not obtained an ACAS early conciliation certificate and no exemption applied. | Dismissed | Religion or belief | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The public listing identifies an unfair dismissal claim; the judgment states that all claims were dismissed because the claimant had not obtained an ACAS early conciliation certificate and no exemption applied. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The public listing identifies an unlawful deduction from wages claim; the judgment states that all claims were dismissed because the claimant had not obtained an ACAS early conciliation certificate and no exemption applied. | Dismissed | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.