Case 2415416/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr B Cocker v Jonple Limited (In Voluntary Creditor's Liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2415416/2021
- Decision date
- 7 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr B Cocker
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal proceeded under rule 21 because the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. On that basis, the Employment Judge determined the claim or parts of it without a hearing and entered judgment for the claimant on the monetary claims set out in the judgment.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £300.00 gross. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £692.32.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,021.29 gross, calculated by reference to 14.75 hours at £69.24 per day. The judgment also included an interest notice stating that unpaid sums could carry interest if not paid within 14 days after the relevant decision day, which was recorded as 7 July 2022, with the calculation day as 8 July 2022 and the stipulated rate as 8%.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and orders payment of £300.00 gross. | Upheld | — | £300 |
| Redundancy | The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and is entitled to a redundancy payment of £692.32. | Upheld | — | £692 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment records that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and orders payment of £1,021.29 gross, calculated as 14.75 hours x £69.24 per day. | Upheld | — | £1,021 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,014
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.