Case 2415436/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Allen v Tangerine Holdings — 2022
- Case reference
- 2415436/2021
- Decision date
- 14 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sharkett REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Allen
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the liability hearing on 8 June 2022, Employment Judge Sharkett found that Mr M Allen's unfair dismissal claim against Tangerine Holdings Limited was well founded and succeeded. The same judgment dismissed his breach of contract claim, which was identified as a claim for a bonus payment, as not well founded.
The tribunal did not set out written reasons in the extracted judgment text, but it recorded that a separate remedy hearing was listed for 27 June 2022 at 1pm to deal with compensation. The tribunal said that any compensation issues would include whether there should be any increase or decrease in any award by reason of the POLKEY principle, any culpable or blameworthy conduct by the claimant, and/or any party's failure to follow a relevant ACAS Code.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim described as a bonus payment claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- POLKEY principle
- ACAS Code
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.