Case 2415475/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F Vatani v Adrian Foods Limited t/a Milano Takeaway — 2021
- Case reference
- 2415475/2020
- Decision date
- 6 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Horne
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr F Vatani
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued without a hearing. Employment Judge Horne found that Adrian Foods Limited t/a Milano Takeaway had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr F Vatani's wages. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £1,984.00 in respect of that claim.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr Vatani's holiday pay and ordered payment of the gross sum of £218.00. The judgment states that the sums are awarded gross and notes that Mr Vatani may be liable to HMRC for tax and national insurance on the amounts awarded. The attached notice explains that interest may apply if the sums remain unpaid after 14 days, but no quantified interest award is recorded in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,984.00. | Upheld | — | £1,984 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's holiday pay and ordered payment of the gross sum of £218.00. | Upheld | — | £218 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,202
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.