Case 2415512/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Cragg (deceased) v Howards Travel Bus and Coach — 2022
- Case reference
- 2415512/2020
- Decision date
- 13 May 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Cragg (deceased)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a strike out judgment under rule 37. The Tribunal recorded that by a letter dated 19 April 2022, the claimant’s personal representatives were given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claims should not be struck out for non-compliance with the Tribunal’s order dated 17 September 2021 and because the claims had not been actively pursued.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that all claims were struck out. It does not list this claim separately, but the case context identifies breach of contract as one of the claims before the Tribunal. | Struck out | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment states that all claims were struck out. It does not list this claim separately, but the case context identifies redundancy as one of the claims before the Tribunal. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that all claims were struck out. It does not list this claim separately, but the case context identifies unfair dismissal as one of the claims before the Tribunal. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that all claims were struck out. It does not list this claim separately, but the case context identifies unlawful deduction from wages as one of the claims before the Tribunal. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.