Case 2415701/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Annette Gumbs of Counsel For v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 2415701/2020
- Decision date
- 15 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Ms Annette Gumbs of Counsel For
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing by CVP on 13 July 2021 before Employment Judge A M Buchanan sitting alone, counsel for both parties confirmed that terms of settlement had been agreed in the case of Ms Jane Taylor v JJ Training (UK) Limited. The tribunal adjourned the matter until 4pm on 17 August 2021 so that those terms could be carried into effect.
The order recorded that if neither party applied to restore the matter to the hearing list before that date, the claims would be treated as withdrawn on settlement by the claimant and would stand dismissed without further order. The extracted text contains no findings on the merits of the underlying claims and no award was made in the judgment itself.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Terms of settlement had been agreed between the parties. The tribunal adjourned the case to 4pm on 17 August 2021 to allow those terms to be carried into effect, and stated that if the matter was not restored by then the claims would be treated as withdrawn on settlement and dismissed without further order. | Settled | — | — |
| Other | The extracted text does not identify this claim separately; it refers generally to 'the claims herein'. The same settlement and conditional withdrawal order was made for the case as a whole. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.