Case 2415781/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Prescott v National Car Parks Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2415781/2020
- Decision date
- 7 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Prescott
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 27 April 2021, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment records no substantive findings on the merits of the underlying disputes and no financial remedy.
The decision was issued by Employment Judge Phil Allen on 4 June 2021 and sent to the parties on 7 June 2021.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment refers to 'the claim' being struck out for not being actively pursued; it does not separately identify the claim type in the reasons. This entry reflects the case listing context. | Struck out | — | — |
| Age discrimination | The judgment refers to 'the claim' being struck out for not being actively pursued; it does not separately identify the claim type in the reasons. This entry reflects the case listing context. | Struck out | Age | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.