Case 2415887/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Hutchinson v Century Motors Farnworth Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2415887/2020
- Decision date
- 1 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rice-Birchall REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Hutchinson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Manchester by CVP on 1 March 2021 before Employment Judge Rice-Birchall, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by Mr Taylor, solicitor. The written judgment records that the claimant's unfair dismissal claim failed and was dismissed.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had made an unlawful deduction from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay £176.68 gross to the claimant.
The written record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. As a result, the written decision does not set out the factual or legal reasoning behind either outcome.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written record states only that the unfair dismissal claim failed and was dismissed. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written record does not set them out. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unlawful deduction from wages and ordered the respondent to pay £176.68 gross. The written record does not set out the tribunal's reasons because they were given orally at the hearing. | Upheld | — | £177 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £177
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.