Case 2415962/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Burke v Liam Browne — 2021
- Case reference
- 2415962/2020
- Decision date
- 2 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Burke
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningUnder Rule 21, Regional Employment Judge Franey found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £472. The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded £349 in damages.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £153. It made no award for failure to provide a written statement of terms because the claimant had been employed for less than one month.
The total amount awarded to the claimant was £974. The hearing listed for 27 January 2021 was cancelled following the judgment dated 26 January 2021.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £472 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Damages were awarded for dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £349 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £153 |
| Other | No award was made for failure to provide a written statement of terms because the claimant had been employed for less than one month. | Other | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £974
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.