Case 2416003/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Lyndon-Dykes Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) and Oak Country Club Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2416003/2020
- Decision date
- 9 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim against Lyndon-Dykes Limited (in compulsory liquidation). It recorded that the company was in compulsory liquidation and that the permission of the court had not been obtained for the proceedings to be instituted or continued as required by the Insolvency Act 1986.
The tribunal also noted that on 17 November 2021 it had given the claimant 14 days to provide written reasons why the claim against the first respondent should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason.
The judgment therefore states that the claim against Lyndon-Dykes Limited is struck out. It further records that the judgment does not affect the claim against Oak Country Club Limited, which was not determined by this decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment strikes out the claim against Lyndon-Dykes Limited (in compulsory liquidation). The reasons given were that the company was in compulsory liquidation, permission of the court had not been obtained for the proceedings to be instituted or continued as required by the Insolvency Act 1986, and the claimant did not give an acceptable reason after being invited to do so on 17 November 2021. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.