Case 2416025/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Dunne v Tamarillo — 2021
- Case reference
- 2416025/2020
- Decision date
- 12 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge McDonald
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Dunne
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss L Dunne brought claims for a redundancy payment, two weeks' statutory notice pay, and four days' holiday pay. The final hearing took place by CVP on 10 February 2021 at Manchester. The claimant did not attend and was not represented. The respondent attended through Mr T Normile, a partner of Tamarillo.
The tribunal attempted to contact the claimant by telephone, adjourned briefly, and left a voicemail asking her to attend or email if she was having difficulty joining. No response was received. Employment Judge McDonald considered Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, which permits dismissal or proceeding in a party's absence where a party fails to attend, after considering any available information about the absence.
Having read the papers and heard from Mr Normile, the tribunal decided it was appropriate to dismiss the claim rather than determine it on the documents alone. The judge said there was a genuine dispute about whether there had been a break in the claimant's employment around March 2020, which mattered to whether she had two years' continuous employment for a redundancy payment. There was also a genuine dispute about whether notice had been given, including a WhatsApp message on 21 June 2020 saying her employment would ultimately end in July 2020.
On holiday pay, the tribunal said there was no evidence before it about the claimant's entitlement or how much holiday she had already taken. The tribunal therefore dismissed all three claims under Rule 47 for non-attendance. The judgment records that the claimant could apply for reconsideration within 14 days of the judgment being sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Dismissed under Rule 47 because the claimant did not attend the hearing. The tribunal also noted a genuine dispute about whether there had been a break in employment around March 2020, which affected continuous employment for redundancy pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The claimant sought two weeks' statutory notice pay. The tribunal dismissed the claim under Rule 47 following non-attendance and noted there was a genuine dispute about whether notice had been given, including a WhatsApp message dated 21 June 2020 saying her employment would end in July 2020. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Dismissed under Rule 47 because the claimant did not attend. The tribunal said there was no evidence before it about the claimant's holiday pay entitlement or how much leave she had already taken. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.