Case 2416045/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Wiatr v The David Lewis Centre — 2021
- Case reference
- 2416045/2020
- Decision date
- 10 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Wiatr
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy case management orders made on 9 September 2021 and sent to the parties on 10 September 2021, Employment Judge Batten gave the claimant an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing before any strike out. The Tribunal identified three reasons for possible strike out: the claimant had failed to attend the case management preliminary hearing on 9 September 2021 and had not engaged with the respondent to prepare for the hearing; he had failed to comply with orders requiring further information about his claims; and it appeared that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient written representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The extracted judgment records no merits findings and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not specify the underlying substantive claims; it records only that 'the claim is struck out' after the claimant failed to respond adequately to the strike-out warning. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.