Case 2416046/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Anson v D.E.L.T.A. Taxis Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2416046/2020
- Decision date
- 18 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Panel members
- Mrs AA Roscoe, Mr A Wells
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Anson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard remotely in Manchester on 16-17 August 2021 before Judge BJ Doyle, Mrs AA Roscoe and Mr A Wells. The claimant, Mr D Anson, appeared in person and the respondent, D.E.L.T.A. Taxis Ltd, was represented by a solicitor.
The judgment records that the claimant's complaints of disability discrimination and unfair dismissal were not well-founded. The tribunal therefore dismissed the claim in full. No separate liability findings, legal analysis, or remedy figures are set out in the written record provided.
The extract also states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. On the material available here, the only recorded outcome is dismissal of both claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal said the disability discrimination complaint was not well-founded and dismissed it. The extract does not set out the oral reasons given at the hearing. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal complaint was dismissed. The extract does not set out the tribunal's oral reasons. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.