Case 2416067/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Taylor v Arts Council England — 2021
- Case reference
- 2416067/2020
- Decision date
- 22 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rice-Birchall
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Taylor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Rice-Birchall sitting alone at Manchester by CVP on 20 September 2021. The judgment records that the claimant was Mr K Taylor and the respondent was Arts Council England.
The only recorded disposition is that the claimant's claim of discrimination arising from disability under section 15 of the Equality Act 2010 was struck out under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. No further reasons for the strike out are set out in the written record.
The record also states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the sending of the written record. No monetary remedy is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The preliminary hearing record states that the claimant's claim of discrimination arising from disability under section 15 of the Equality Act 2010 was struck out under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 15 Equality Act 2010
- rule 37 Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.