Case 2416403/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Storey v BT Group plc — 2024
- Case reference
- 2416403/2018
- Decision date
- 13 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Slater
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Storey
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis judgment concerns the respondent’s application for costs after the claimant withdrew his employment tribunal claims on the morning of the listed final hearing. The tribunal recorded that the claimant had brought disability discrimination claims, that the merits hearing was listed for 5 February 2024, and that the claims were dismissed upon withdrawal when he did not attend.
The tribunal found that the claimant had breached tribunal orders by failing to provide disclosure, failing to exchange witness statements and failing to attend the final hearing. It also found that, from 4 January 2024 at the latest, the claimant acted unreasonably in the way he conducted the proceedings by choosing not to prepare the case on the basis that he expected the personal injury claim to be heard first, despite being told that the tribunal hearing remained listed and that he should continue to prepare.
The tribunal further found that the withdrawal at 8.33am on the morning of the hearing was unreasonably late and caused the respondent to incur unnecessary hearing preparation costs. It did not, however, go so far as to find that the claimant had acted vexatiously or that he had brought or conducted the proceedings simply to harass the respondent. Taking account of the claimant’s ability to pay and proportionality, the tribunal summarily assessed costs at £20,000 rather than directing a detailed assessment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states that the claimant brought disability discrimination claims and that they were dismissed upon withdrawal on 5 February 2024. This costs judgment does not determine the underlying merits of any disability discrimination allegations or separately identify individual disability-related causes of action. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £20,000
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
9 references- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 r.76(1)(a)
- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 r.76(2)
- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 r.84 ability to pay
- Ayoola v St Christopher's Fellowship UKEAT/0508/13/BA
- McPherson v BNP Paribas (London Branch)
- Barnsley MBC v Yerrakalava
- Jilley v Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Trust
- Arrowsmith v Nottingham Trent University
- Vaughan v LB Lewisham
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.