Case 2416494/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Smith v Delphic International Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2416494/2019
- Decision date
- 11 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter Parties
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a short judgment in which the tribunal recorded that, by agreement, Delphic International Ltd was ordered to pay Mr S Smith wages in the sum of £1,800 net. The case was heard in Liverpool on 6 March 2020 before Employment Judge Shotter Parties.
The only substantive disposal recorded in the judgment is the agreed payment of wages. No separate findings of fact or legal analysis are set out, and the judgment does not identify any split between different heads of loss. The remedy therefore appears to be a single agreed sum of £1,800 net.
The accompanying interest notice states the relevant decision day as 11 March 2020, the calculation day as 12 March 2020, and the stipulated rate of interest as 8% if the sum is not paid within 14 days after the written judgment was sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that, by agreement, the respondent was ordered to pay wages of £1,800 net. | Settled | — | £1,800 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,800
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.