Case 2416506/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Palmer v Century Care Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2416506/2019
- Decision date
- 5 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Howard Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Palmer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 13 October 2020 at Manchester Employment Tribunal, before Employment Judge Howard, the parties informed the tribunal that they had agreed terms of settlement in the sum of £1,108.50. The claimant was in person and the respondent was represented by Mrs C Thomas.
The judgment does not set out findings on the merits of any underlying claim. Instead, it postpones the hearing and provides that if neither party applied for the matter to be restored by 19 October 2020, the claimant’s claims would be dismissed upon withdrawal without further order.
The extract does not identify the specific causes of action, any legal tests applied, or any separate award structure beyond the settlement figure.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the parties agreed terms of settlement in the amount of £1,108.50. It states that the hearing was postponed and that, if neither party applied for the matter to be restored by 19 October 2020, the claimant’s claims would be dismissed upon withdrawal without further order. The text does not identify the underlying heads of claim. | Settled | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,109
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.