Case 2416523/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Hales v Mothercare UK Limited (in administration) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2416523/2019
- Decision date
- 2 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Robinson
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Hales
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant and respondent were not in attendance at the hearing before Employment Judge Robinson, sitting alone.
The Tribunal dismissed all of the claimant's claims on the basis that they had not been actively pursued. The judgment records no monetary award and no written reasons beyond the short judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that all claims were dismissed because they had not been actively pursued; it does not set out separate reasoning for this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that all claims were dismissed because they had not been actively pursued; it does not set out separate reasoning for this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that all claims were dismissed because they had not been actively pursued; it does not set out separate reasoning for this claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.