Case 2416538/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Porter v Trufab Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2416538/2019
- Decision date
- 3 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Horne Representatives
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Porter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Liverpool on 24 November 2020 before Employment Judge Horne, with the claimant appearing in person and the respondent represented by a solicitor. The hearing was remote by video platform, and neither party objected to that format.
The tribunal's written judgment records only the outcome. It found that Mr Porter was not constructively dismissed, and for that reason his unfair dismissal complaint failed.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing, but no written reasons were provided in the extracted judgment text unless requested in writing within 14 days of the judgment being sent to the parties. No remedy was awarded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant was not constructively dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant's unfair dismissal complaint therefore failed because he was not constructively dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.