Case 2416541/2019 · Employment Tribunal
I Konopko v Market Gosia Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2416541/2019
- Decision date
- 23 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
I Konopko
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Franey found that Market Gosia Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from I Konopko's wages and had failed to pay his holiday entitlement. The tribunal therefore upheld both claims and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £2,035.60 for the wages deduction and £643.66 for holiday pay.
The judgment also stated that the hearing listed for 4 February 2020 was cancelled. A separate notice explained the operation of the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 and recorded that, if the sums were not paid within 14 days of the relevant decision day, interest would accrue at the stipulated rate of 8% from 24 January 2020. No separate interest figure was quantified in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum of £2,035.60 for an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £2,036 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal ordered payment of the gross sum of £643.66 for failure to pay holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £644 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,679
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.