Case 2416553/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Nickson v Cricketers Inns Ltd (in Administration) — 2020
- Case reference
- 2416553/2019
- Decision date
- 11 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Nickson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Mr D Nickson's claim against Cricketers Inns Ltd (in Administration) because it had not been actively pursued. By a letter dated 29 September 2020, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out. He made written representations on 29 September 2020, but did not make any further sufficient representations by 14 November 2020.
On that basis, the tribunal held that the claim should be struck out. No substantive liability findings or remedy award were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. A letter dated 29/09/2020 gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations, and although he initially responded in writing on 29 September 2020, he did not make any further sufficient representations by 14 November 2020. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.