Case 2416594/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Guaranteed Same Day Couriers Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2416594/2019
- Decision date
- 28 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tom Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to present a response within the time prescribed by rule 16 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. Employment Judge Tom Ryan therefore recorded that Miss S Richards's complaints for unpaid wages, unpaid holiday pay and breach of contract (notice pay) were well-founded.
The tribunal awarded £600 for unpaid wages, described as 6 days at £100 per day, comprising 1 week in hand and 1 day on 25 November 2019. It also awarded £700 for unpaid holiday pay, calculated at 7 days at £100 per day, and £2,000 for notice pay, calculated as 4 weeks at £500 per week.
The total award was £3,300, payable on or before 27 March 2020. The accompanying interest notice stated that the relevant decision day was 28 February 2020, the calculation day was 29 February 2020, and the stipulated rate of interest was 8% if the award remained unpaid in accordance with the notice.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Awarded £600 for unpaid wages, calculated as 6 days at £100 per day (described as 1 week in hand and 1 day on 25 November 2019). | Upheld | — | £600 |
| Holiday pay | Awarded £700 for unpaid holiday pay, calculated as 7 days at £100 per day. | Upheld | — | £700 |
| Breach of contract | Awarded £2,000 for unpaid notice pay, calculated as 4 weeks at £500 per week. | Upheld | — | £2,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,300
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.