Case 2416613/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Daley v The Nursery Kitchen Limited (in administration) and 3 others — 2021
- Case reference
- 2416613/2019
- Decision date
- 25 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson
Parties
5 namedClaimant
Mr M Daley
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Liverpool in private by telephone on 24 August 2020 before Employment Judge Benson sitting alone. The written judgment dated 30 September 2020 records two disposals: all claims against the fourth respondent, Life Choice Limited, were dismissed, and the claim of automatic dismissal under section 103A Employment Rights Act was dismissed upon withdrawal.
The extracted judgment text gives no further reasons, findings of fact, liability analysis, or remedy award. No monetary sum is recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Order 1 states that all claims against the fourth respondent, Life Choice Limited, are dismissed. The written record does not specify the individual causes of action in that order. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | Order 2 records that the claim of automatic dismissal pursuant to section 103A Employment Rights Act was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.