Case 2416618/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Joe Higginson v Roanza Solutions Limited (In Administration) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2416618/2019
- Decision date
- 26 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Panel members
- Mr Grahame Barker, Mr Ian Taylor
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Joe Higginson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Mr Higginson's complaints of wrongful dismissal, unfair dismissal contrary to ss.98, 100 and 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and detriments contrary to ss.44(1)(c) and 47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996 were well-founded. The claim was upheld. The respondent, Roanza Solutions Ltd (in administration), did not attend or represent at the remote hearing on 19 April 2021.
The tribunal awarded £29,945.30 in total. It recorded £3,350.34 for wrongful dismissal, being 7 weeks' notice pay at £478.62 net per week. For unfair dismissal it awarded a basic award of £2,362.50, calculated on 4.5 weeks at the capped weekly rate of £525.00, and compensatory losses of £9,232.46 made up of £500 for loss of statutory rights, £5,264.82 for past loss of earnings, £1,030.92 for later past loss of earnings, and £2,436.72 for future loss of earnings.
The tribunal also awarded £15,000 for injury to feelings, describing that figure as being towards the middle of the middle Vento band under the Presidential Guidance April 2019. It said the recoupment regulations did not apply to the award. No award was made for personal injury or other heads of loss in the schedule of loss, although the claimant was told he could apply for reconsideration if any such award could be supported by evidence and argument.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Detriments contrary to ss.44(1)(c) and 47B ERA 1996 were upheld together; injury to feelings was assessed at the middle of the middle Vento band. | Upheld | — | £15,000 |
| Wrongful dismissal | Awarded as 7 weeks' notice pay for the period 10 September 2019 to 29 October 2019. | Upheld | — | £3,350 |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal awarded a basic award and compensatory losses; the judgment did not separately allocate the compensation between the dismissal and detriment complaints. | Upheld | — | £11,595 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £29,945
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £2,363
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £9,232
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.98 ERA 1996
- s.100 ERA 1996
- s.103A ERA 1996
- s.44(1)(c) ERA 1996
- s.47B ERA 1996
- Vento band (Presidential Guidance April 2019)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.