Case 2416664/2019 · Employment Tribunal
1. The British Airline Pilots Association 2. Mr S Backhouse & Others (see Schedule) v Thomas Cook Airlines Ltd (In Compulsory Liquidation) and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 2416664/2019
- Decision date
- 4 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ainscough Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
1. The British Airline Pilots Association 2. Mr S Backhouse & Others (see Schedule)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal issued judgment under rule 21 because the first respondent had not presented a response and the Official Receiver confirmed that the protective award claims would not be contested. The first respondent was in compulsory liquidation, and High Court permission had been granted for the claims to proceed.
The Tribunal found that the first respondent employed over 20 employees at the relevant airport sites and that BALPA was the recognised trade union for collective bargaining, consultation and negotiation for the pilot workforce. The individual non-union claimants were part of the same bargaining unit and their claims were consolidated with the recognised trade union's claims.
The first respondent went into compulsory liquidation on 23 September 2019 and the claimants were notified of immediate termination later that day. The Tribunal found there was no proper warning, notice or consultation with BALPA or the individual pilots, and no employee representatives had been elected or appointed for consultation. It held that the first respondent breached section 188 TULRCA 1992 and made a protective award for the maximum protected period of 90 days beginning on 23 September 2019. For the later 2020 claims, the Tribunal found they were out of time but that it was not reasonably practicable to bring them within three months and they were brought within a further reasonable period.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Protective award claim under section 189 TULRCA 1992 for failure to comply with collective consultation requirements under section 188. Award expressed as 90 days' remuneration from 23 September 2019, not as a monetary sum. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 - Rule 21
- section 188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189(5) Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.