Case 2416679/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs H Instone v Dovehaven Residential Care Homes Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2416679/2019
- Decision date
- 3 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson Representation
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs H Instone
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 28 August 2020, before Employment Judge Benson sitting in Liverpool, the tribunal held that Mrs H Instone had been unfairly dismissed by Dovehaven Residential Care Homes Limited. The judgment records that the parties had agreed the compensation figure for that finding.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,933.35 as compensation for the unfair dismissal. It also ordered a further £424.45 in respect of the claimant's preparation time and witness expenses arising from the respondent's application for postponement of an earlier hearing. The judgment states that the recoupment regulations do not apply.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal recorded that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and ordered payment of the agreed compensation sum of £1,933.35. | Upheld | — | £1,933 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,358
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,933
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.