Case 2416681/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Khan v Engie Services Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2416681/2018
- Decision date
- 2 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Khan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal identified the case as a claim for unlawful deduction from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The claimant said that after his July 2017 relocation from Blackburn Hospital to Tameside General Hospital he had not been paid what he was due, including alleged shortfall in pay, travel expenses, overtime, and sick pay.
On the evidence, the tribunal found that the claimant’s annual salary of £16,698 had not changed on relocation and that his belief he was being paid less was linked to confusion about net pay and deductions, and to reduced overtime opportunities at the new site. The tribunal also found there was no evidence of any entitlement to mileage or travel expenses for travel to his base location, and no sufficient evidence that overtime worked had gone unpaid.
The tribunal held that the travel expenses and overtime aspects were presented out of time under section 23 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and that it had been reasonably practicable to bring them earlier. As to sick pay, although the payslips and adjustments were confusing, the tribunal accepted the respondent’s evidence and spreadsheet showing that the claimant had in fact received the full six months’ contractual sick pay. The claim was therefore dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The unlawful deduction from wages claim covered alleged underpayment after relocation, travel expenses, overtime, and sick pay. The travel expenses and overtime elements were found out of time and, in any event, not made out. The sick pay element was in time but failed on the evidence because the tribunal found the claimant had received his full contractual sick pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Besong v Connex Bus (UK) Limited UKEAT/436/04
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.