Case 2416686/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Dale v Tangerine Holdings Ltd T/a Mill Farm Sports Village and Mill Farm Ventures — 2019
- Case reference
- 2416686/2018
- Decision date
- 10 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs V Dale brought claims against Tangerine Holdings Ltd trading as Mill Farm Sports Village and Mill Farm Ventures. The tribunal extended the first respondent’s time for presenting its ET3 response to 11 February 2019 and accepted the response out of time. It also found that Mrs Dale was employed by the first respondent, Tangerine Holdings Ltd, which traded as Mill Farm Sports Village.
The tribunal held that the respondent made unlawful deductions from the claimant’s wages in respect of her salary and payment for accrued paid annual leave not yet taken at termination of employment. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £2,300.98 gross. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The award covered unpaid salary and payment for accrued, untaken paid annual leave at termination; the judgment does not split the £2,300.98 between those components. | Upheld | — | £2,301 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,301
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.