Case 2416696/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Ms L Foley v Salford Academy Trust — 2020
- Case reference
- 2416696/2018
- Decision date
- 20 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ross
- Venue
- Manchester
- Panel members
- Miss S Howarth, Ms V Worthington
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms L Foley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in Manchester on 13 January 2020, before Employment Judge Ross with Miss S Howarth and Ms V Worthington, the parties informed the tribunal that terms of settlement had been agreed. The judgment does not record any liability findings or substantive determination of the pleaded issues.
The tribunal stayed the case until 4 February 2020 so that the settlement terms could take effect. It also directed that if no application had been made to the tribunal by 4.00pm on 4 February 2020, the case would stand dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant, with her consent to that course.
The judgment therefore records a settlement-based disposal rather than a merits decision, and no monetary award is stated in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the parties had agreed terms of settlement. The case was stayed until 4 February 2020 for those terms to take effect. It further provided that if no application was made by 4.00pm on 4 February 2020, the case would stand dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant with her consent. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.