Case 2416699/2019 · Employment Tribunal

Mrs K Webster v Friday Media Group Limited and 1 other — 2020

Case reference: 2416699/2019
Decision date: 28 February 2020
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Holmes Date

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

3 named

Claimant

Mrs K Webster

Respondents

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Employment Judge Holmes recorded that the claimant had withdrawn the claims against the second respondent, Karen Niblock. Those claims were dismissed from the proceedings. The judgment does not identify the underlying claim type or make any findings on liability.

The claimant also withdrew the breach of contract claim against the first and remaining respondent, Friday Media Group Limited, and that claim was dismissed. The order records no award of compensation or other remedy.

The judgment expressly states that the claimant's other claims were unaffected by this order and would proceed. It is therefore a procedural judgment disposing only of the withdrawn claims, not a merits decision on the remaining case.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	Claims against the second respondent, Karen Niblock, were withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed from the proceedings; the specific claim type is not identified in the extracted text.	Withdrawn	—	—
Breach of contract	The claimant withdrew the breach of contract claim against the first respondent, Friday Media Group Limited, and the tribunal dismissed it.	Withdrawn	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.