Case 2416720/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G James v Crest Scaffolding Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2416720/2019
- Decision date
- 20 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G James
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Franey recorded that the proceedings in case 2416720/2019 were dismissed after the claimant, Mr G James, withdrew the claim. The judgment does not record findings on liability, remedy, or any substantive issues, and it gives no separate disposal for individual heads of claim.
The order is dated 3 January 2020 and the judgment was sent to the parties on 20 January 2020. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment text states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of 'the claim' by the claimant. The extracted judgment does not separate the withdrawal by head of claim; this claim type is inferred from the case listing context supplied with the record. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment text states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of 'the claim' by the claimant. The extracted judgment does not separate the withdrawal by head of claim; this claim type is inferred from the case listing context supplied with the record. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.