Case 2416790/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Hetherington v Outrageous Nightlife (UK) Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2416790/2019
- Decision date
- 23 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Hetherington
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting under Rule 21, recorded three monetary claims arising from Miss N Hetherington's employment with Outrageous Nightlife (UK) Ltd. It found that she had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £555.80.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and that she was entitled to a redundancy payment of £555.80. In addition, it held that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £937.80.
The judgment directed that payment be made within 14 days. The separate notice on interest stated that sums payable under the judgment would carry interest if not paid within 14 days after the relevant decision day, with the stipulated rate identified as 8%, but no separate interest figure was set out in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Damages awarded for breach of contract in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £556 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal held the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £556 |
| Holiday pay | The respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £938 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,049
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.