Case 2416791/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Hetherington v Outrageous Nightlife (UK) Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2416791/2019
- Decision date
- 23 April 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Hetherington
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in favour of Miss K Hetherington against Outrageous Nightlife (UK) Ltd. Employment Judge Phil Allen recorded that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and ordered damages of £300.34.
The judgment also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement, and ordered payment of £567.39. Payment was required within 14 days. The total sum awarded on the face of the judgment was £867.73.
A separate notice under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 stated that if the sums were not paid within 14 days after the relevant decision day, interest would accrue at the stipulated rate of 8% from the calculation day. No other findings or remedy components were set out in the extracted text.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment says the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awards damages of £300.34. | Upheld | — | £300 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment says the respondent failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and awards £567.39. | Upheld | — | £567 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £868
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.